In recording observations, what should be avoided?

In recording observations, what should be avoided?

• A. Stating opinions; instead record facts.
• B. Recording any nonverbal behavior.
• C. Taking notes at all.
• D. Following agency policy.

Answer: (A)

Recording observations should be objective and fact-based. Opinions and judgments aren’t verifiable by others and can introduce bias, so they’re best avoided. The aim is to capture what can be observed and measured, not how you interpret it. For example, instead of writing that a person seems hostile, describe observable details: hands clenched, shoulders tense, voice raised, stepping forward. These details are factual and verifiable. Nonverbal behavior isn’t inherently something to exclude; it’s useful when described objectively, not as inferred motives. So record nonverbal cues only in terms of what is observable, avoiding interpretations about why the person is acting that way. Taking notes is essential for accuracy and accountability, and following agency policy ensures consistency and legal defensibility.

Recording observations should be objective and fact-based. Opinions and judgments aren’t verifiable by others and can introduce bias, so they’re best avoided. The aim is to capture what can be observed and measured, not how you interpret it. For example, instead of writing that a person seems hostile, describe observable details: hands clenched, shoulders tense, voice raised, stepping forward. These details are factual and verifiable.

Nonverbal behavior isn’t inherently something to exclude; it’s useful when described objectively, not as inferred motives. So record nonverbal cues only in terms of what is observable, avoiding interpretations about why the person is acting that way.

Taking notes is essential for accuracy and accountability, and following agency policy ensures consistency and legal defensibility.